Prior to beginning work on this discussion, please read â€œLearning Strategiesâ€ (pp. 137-143), â€œTechnology and Learningâ€ (pp. 144-153), â€œLearning as Inquiryâ€ (pp. 154-159), and â€œCooperative Learningâ€ (pp.160-166) in your required text. Review the information from The Critical Thinking Community. Play the expert in the following scenario and apply ethical principles and professional standards of learning and cognition psychology to your rationale: You are a computer software training instructor for a large corporation that designs bicycles. You have a group of new trainees who must learn your companyâ€™s design software system. List two areas of the learning environment that might be problematic to your training if you implement a fully online/asynchronous training program. What two strategies could you use to assist your learners/trainees with this protocol of learning based on your two noted areas? Based on the course content and the knowledge you have gained in this course so far, what mode of learning environment would you suggest for your group of new trainees? Support your reasoning with empirical evidence. Using appropriate citations and references, explain how the empirical findings presented in the assigned articles suggest the importance of applying self-regulation and metacognitive strategies to oneâ€™s own learning. Describe the purpose of learner assessments and how self-regulation positively affects the outcomes. Does self-regulation need to be applied differently in virtual learning environments than in traditional classrooms? What problems may occur for learners who have not developed self-regulation in asynchronous learning or training environments? What do your articles suggest the pros and cons are of cooperative learning or training? Based on your own experiences, do you agree or disagree with the suggestion that cooperative environments are beneficial? If so, why? If not, what could have been done differently in your example based on the empirical findings within your resources? Support your argument with empirical research. Week four Discussuion 2 An elevator speech is an excellent way to convey your skills while networking and seeking employment.Â Typically, an elevator speech is a one-minute summary of who you are, why you are qualified, and what you have to offer the organization or industry. Creating this brief sales-pitch will help better prepare you to discuss your career goals whenever the opportunity presents itself. This type of interaction might occur at a networking event, during a job interview, or within a social setting such as a party or a ride in an elevator. Watch The Elevator Pitch video about creating an elevator speech, and design a one-minute sales pitch tailored toward your chosen career path.Â It is recommended that you also review the How to Craft an Effective Elevator Speech online resource. Consider the person in your field who you would most like the opportunity to speak with. Keep this person in mind throughout the process. It is important to specifically discuss your areas of expertise in learning and cognition and how they could be applied to benefit the organization or industry and your future success is this field. Briefly explain any theoretical perspectives that apply to these areas. Once you have determined what should be included in your pitch, you will record your 30-second to one-minute audio or video presentation using any recording software of your choice. (Quick-start guides for Screencast-O-Matic and YouTube are provided for your convenience should you decide to use these.) It is recommended that you create a script or, at minimum, a list of talking points prior to creating your recording. For an explanation of steps to follow when creating an elevator speech, read the PSY620: Preparing Your Elevator Speech document. Once you have completed your recording, share your pitch with the class by copying and pasting the link for your recording into your discussion post. Include the name of the person you chose to give your speech to as well as a 50- to 150-word description of the individualâ€™s background, industry, area of expertise, and your rationale for choosing this person Week 4 Journal Prior to beginning this journal entry, read â€œThe Development of Expertise in Performance: The Role of Memory, Knowledge, Learning, and Practiceâ€ and â€œTransitions and the Development of Expertise,â€ as well as review all other required resources. It is important for you to have already completed your initial post in the â€œLearning Trendsâ€ discussion before you compose this journal entry. Part 1: As you were reading this week, what vocabulary was used that was unfamiliar to you or might be to your peers? Identify three to five words from this weekâ€™s content and research each word in the context of learning and cognition. Explain, in your own words, what each word means and how it is used in the context of learning and cognition. Part 2: Based on the weekâ€™s discourse and content, you will access the Ashford University Library and research one scholarly article pertaining to expertise that was published within the last 10 years. Provide a summary explanation of the findings on â€œexpertiseâ€ in the context of your article. What implications should scholars consider based on this information? Support your explanation utilizing this weekâ€™s resources and your researched article. Part 3: Consider the events from the past week of your life. How does expertise, or the perception of it, affect our behaviors, actions, and knowledge development? Describe one personal real-life example of an occurrence that supports the implications of actual expertise, or the perception of it, on our behaviors and actions toward others. As you share this information, consider and apply the professional standards found in â€œ12.06 Anonymity of Sourcesâ€found in the AERA Code of Ethics. Part 4: Review â€œPrinciple A: Professional Competenceâ€ in the AERA Code of Ethics. What implications should be considered in your scholarly writing and observations? How might you check for competence of the research in articles and research studies you read? Explain the public impression(s) and misconception(s) that can occur when secular articles or studies (e.g., Yahoo survey results, newspaper reports) are used instead of findings from peer-reviewed sources.
Parameter Estimation, Inferences, and Tests of Difference
Give us your instructions.
Select the type of service you need: writing, calculations, or programming. We’ve created an intuitive order form that tells you what information to enter and where, so make sure to fill out each required field. Also, make your requirements as specific as possible. Don’t rush! Take your time and explain everything in detail how it works.
Proceed to checkout and enter your credit card details or PayPal login, how to pay. Follow the payment provider’s instructions to confirm the transaction.
Now your order is in our system! We’ll start processing it right away.
Need help with a similar question?
Place an order and we will get it done
How It Works
Fast, Secure, and Confidential!
Fill in the Order Form
Submit your instructions through our small order form online
Make a payment
The price is based on these factors: Academic level, Number of pages, Urgency, Type of paper needed
We choose the most suitable writer
We choose the most suitable writer.