Evaluate Cushmans use of Nebbia to support his claim that West Coast Hotel was not revolutionary. What interdoctrinal connections must he make to support his claim? Are those connections sufficient to establish that the decision in West Coast Hotel is not revolutionary? Does the Courts opinion in West Coast Hotel sound revolutionary?
See Cushmans Preface vii for the term interdoctrinal connections and for examples of doctrines. Chapters 3, 4 and 5 for the text of Cushmans arguments regarding the relevance of Nebbia for his reading of West Coast Hotel. Your paper should review those arguments and then give your reasons for either accepting or rejecting those arguments. This last is the most important part of your paper.
The paper needs to be 2-3 pages long, MLA format. Double Spacing, Times New Roman font.